This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by DuBeshter, B. Articles by Angel, C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by DuBeshter, B. Articles by Angel, C.

Experience With Computerized Chemotherapy Order Entry

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY

Corresponding author: Brent DuBeshter, MD, Suite 258, 125 Lattimore Road, Rochester, NY 14620, Brent_DuBeshter{at}urmc.rochester.edu

PURPOSE: The elimination of errors related to chemotherapy administration remains an elusive goal. Computerized order entry has been shown to reduce errors. We assessed a chemotherapy computer order entry system for errors related to dosing and for the time required to prepare chemotherapy orders.

METHODS: A prospective study of all patients treated with chemotherapy over a 12-month period was performed. Chemotherapy order sets done via computerized order entry were reviewed for errors related to drug selection, dose calculations, decimal-point errors, and for exceeding a warning level set within the system. We also measured the time required to produce three order sets by hand versus by computer.

RESULTS: There were no errors in dose calculations, decimal points, or drug selection for 2,558 drug administrations in 235 patients treated with 26 different chemotherapy regimens. The dose warning level was exceeded in 152 (6%) of drug administrations, but never without user permission to override the warning. The average time saved per order set using computer order entry was 10 minutes (P < .05).

CONCLUSION: By using computer order entry with error-checking algorithms, it may be possible to eliminate a number of types of errors associated with chemotherapy administration without sacrificing efficiency.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. N. Shulman, R. S. Miller, E. P. Ambinder, P. P. Yu, and J. V. Cox Principles of Safe Practice Using an Oncology EHR System for Chemotherapy Ordering, Preparation, and Administration, Part 2 of 2 J. Oncol. Pract, September 1, 2008; 4(5): 254 - 257. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. N. Shulman, R. S. Miller, E. P. Ambinder, P. P. Yu, and J. V. Cox Principles of Safe Practice Using an Oncology EHR System for Chemotherapy Ordering, Preparation, and Administration, Part 1 of 2 J. Oncol. Pract, July 1, 2008; 4(4): 203 - 206. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. E. Wolfe Making the Case for Electronic Health Records: A Report From ASCO's EHR Symposium J. Oncol. Pract, January 1, 2008; 4(1): 41 - 42. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A J Munro Hidden danger, obvious opportunity: error and risk in the management of cancer Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2007; 80(960): 955 - 966. [Full Text] [PDF]