This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Maguire, P. D. Articles by Tepper, J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Maguire, P. D. Articles by Tepper, J.

A Bridge Between Academic and Community Radiation Oncology Treatment Planning

New Hanover Radiation Oncology, Wilmington, NC; Coastal Area Health Education Center, Wilmington, NC; University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Chapel Hill, NC

Corresponding author: Patrick D. Maguire, MD, 1988 S 16th St, Wilmington, NC 28401; e-mail: pmags{at}bizec.rr.com

Purpose: To evaluate Telesynergy (TS) as a method of interactive treatment planning between academic and community radiation oncology departments.

Methods: Through a grant from the National Cancer Institute to improve cancer outcomes for underserved populations, community radiation oncologists at New Hanover Regional Medical Center (NHRMC) in Wilmington, North Carolina, partnered with those at the University of North Carolina (UNC) in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. TS suites were installed at both sites to facilitate teleconferencing and review of treatment planning for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer at NHRMC who were enrolled on a clinical trial of chemoirradiation underwent IMRT planning utilizing commercial software. NHRMC physicians contoured tumor targets and adjacent healthy organs. Physics staff at NHRMC generated an initial IMRT plan for each patient. Radiation oncologists at UNC then reviewed individual IMRT plans via TS conferences.

Results and Conclusion: Between August 2004 and August 2005, seven IMRT plans were reviewed in eight TS conferences. Physician contours of tumor targets and healthy organs, dose volume histograms, IMRT beams, and isodose distributions were shared during each TS conference successfully. Median time for each session was 35 minutes (range, 30 to 75). Physician satisfaction with the interactive planning process was high at both NHRMC and UNC. A cycle would likely evolve of initial intensive use of TS conferences, to gradual use for ongoing quality control, then greater use as the treatment planning technology undergoes its next change. Complex IMRT treatment planning review was feasible between an academic and community hospital via TS with a high level of physician participant satisfaction.