Advertisement
Journal of Oncology Practice  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Topic or Issue
Home Search or Browse JOP Subscriptions PDA Services E-mail Alerts Customer Service

Journal of Oncology Practice, Vol 4, No 3 (May), 2008: pp. 108-113
© 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JOP.0832001

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Field, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gibbs, P.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Field, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gibbs, P.

Original Research

Chemotherapy Dosing Strategies in the Obese, Elderly, and Thin Patient: Results of a Nationwide Survey

Kathryn M. Field, MD, Suzanne Kosmider, MD, Michael Jefford, PhD, MBBS, MPH, Michael Michael, MBBS, Ross Jennens, MD, Michael Green, MD, Peter Gibbs, MD, MBBS

Department of Medical Oncology, Western Hospital, Footscray; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne; Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria; and Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Australia

Corresponding author: Peter Gibbs, MD, MBBS,Department of Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital Royal Parade, Parkville Victoria 3052, Australia Email: peter.gibbs{at}mh.org.au

Purpose: Determining the optimal starting dose of chemotherapy (CHT) presents a considerable challenge when using body-surface area (BSA)–based dosing, particularly in obese, elderly, or thin patients. We sought to document the range of approaches employed when administering CHT to these patients.

Methods: A questionnaire was developed by a panel of oncologists and mailed to all members of the Medical Oncology Group of Australia.

Results: From 315 oncologists, 188 responded (response rate 59.7%). BSA-based dosing is standard practice for 176 (97.2%) of the responding oncologists. In the adjuvant disease setting, 23 (12.7%) use ideal rather than actual body weight (BW) to calculate BSA, or choose whichever is less. When treating obese patients, only 6.1% of respondents routinely use actual BW. Of the remainder, 69.5% either cap the dose at 2 m2 or use ideal BW. In underweight patients, 95% (n = 171) routinely calculate BSA using actual BW. Forty one respondents (22.7%) routinely reduce dose in the fit elderly.

Conclusion: This analysis of BSA-based CHT dosing methods demonstrates significant variability in practice. Based on evidence from adjuvant studies showing that actual BSA-based dosing is desirable, a substantial number of Australian patients are being underdosed. Further education, together with ongoing research, is required to optimize individualized dosing for efficacy and tolerability.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Oncol PractHome page
G. H. Lyman
Caring for the Elderly Cancer Patient: Training the Next Generation of Oncologists
J. Oncol. Pract, July 1, 2008; 4(4): 193 - 194.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Oncol PractHome page
D. W. Blayney
See You in Chicago
J. Oncol. Pract, May 1, 2008; 4(3): 107 - 107.
[Full Text] [PDF]



About
JOP
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 Site Map

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1935-469X. Print ISSN: 1554-7477
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JOP Online