Advertisement
Journal of Oncology Practice  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Topic or Issue
Home Search or Browse JOP Subscriptions PDA Services E-mail Alerts Customer Service

Journal of Oncology Practice, Vol 2, No 3 (May), 2006: pp. 103
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2.3.103

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tucker, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tucker, S.

Perspective

Cost Savings and Luteinizing Hormone–Releasing Hormone Agonist

Steven Tucker, MD

Because this article has no abstract, we have provided an extract of the first 20% of the full text.


Figure 1
Steven Tucker, MD

In the March 2006 issue of the Journal of Oncology Practice, Wagmiller et al1 describe significant potential cost savings for use of an individualized luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (LH-RHa) strategy based on serum testosterone triggers rather than strict manufacturer guidelines. It is clear and well documented that gonadal suppression persists for months after LH-RHa therapy is held, and even minimal androgen recovery may be delayed by more than . . . [Click for More]






About
JOP
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 Site Map

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1935-469X. Print ISSN: 1554-7477
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JOP Online